|
|
|
Welcome to EdSpeak.org!
EdSpeak.org was created to collect, study, and exchange information on how to improve PreK-12 public schools. Visitors to this site can look at school reform models, ideas about assessment, the results of our partnership work, portable classrooms (EduCrate), a new theory for teaching and learning (VIA), and a visual gallery of student work. EdSpeak.org is the public website of The SchoolWorks Lab, Inc., a non-profit organization founded by educator Rob Southworth. We help schools, districts and education organizations make sense of school reform. Please enjoy your time here on the site!
|
Home
|
Kruse Sorting Exercise Handout |
|
|
|
|
Written by Robert A. Southworth Jr.
|
|
Tuesday, 29 April 2008 |
CommonGround 2008
Rob Southworth & Mike Halverson
Here is the handout outline we worked from during the workshop...
Exercise I:
Travel & Accommodations evaluation
Step One
Please briefly answer the following questions separately on the index cards provided, in the color indicated. (Take no more than two minutes per question.)
A. PINK: If you could have changed anything at all about your travel to Albany or your accommodations for CommonGround 2008, what do you wish you had done differently?
B. BLUE: What resources would you have needed to accomplish the change(s)? Or what obstacles were in the way?
C. YELLOW: What is the likelihood of doing things differently next time? Why?
|
|
|
Change in Thinking for our Workshop |
|
|
|
|
Written by Robert A. Southworth Jr.
|
|
Wednesday, 16 April 2008 |
CommonGround 2008
Rob Southworth & Mike Halverson
What might change in your thinking or arts/ education activities as a result of this workshop?
Observation
Observation is critical to human development.
I'll be more confident about the importance of PURE observation in assessment.
I like the idea of letting kids/ listening to kids, tell you what they understand.
I will continue to observe the world around me and live in it as an existential character.
I will observe, observe, observe and encourage students to evaluate themselves.
I want to listen and observe more carefully.
I will use formula of observe, assess, integrate in planning lessons and discussions.
I will revisit the concept of observation.
|
|
|
Versatile Intelligence and Assessment (VIA) at Common Ground |
|
|
|
|
Written by Robert A. Southworth Jr.
|
|
Wednesday, 16 April 2008 |
Versatile Intelligence and Assessment
A Sustainable Instability Workshop
Building Capacity to change with Mindful Innovations
Rob and Mike, Southworth and Halverson
Common Ground, Albany, 2008
Instability is the rule
Letting go opens up change
Complex situations require a brain-like response
Build networks
Information and technology drive the fragmentation
Response to Instability
Researcher Peter Kruse says:
Stagger on with our lives
React on a case by case pattern
Rationalize
Develop a collective network of intelligence
Cortex and Limbic Systems
Cortex is quick learning and most highly evolved
Limbic is emotional and rules our actions
Scripts and learnt frameworks rule unless contradicted
Networks Respond to Complexity
Complexity, fragmentation and the loss of cohesion
Creating and adopting strong AIE Partnerships is like building brain networks of intelligence
|
|
|
Feds Ease No Child Left Behind |
|
|
|
|
Written by Robert A. Southworth Jr.
|
|
Wednesday, 19 March 2008 |
In an Article by SAM DILLON
of the New York Times (March 19, 2008), the Federal Government began to ease its regulation of the nation's schools: "The Bush administration, acknowledging that the federal No Child Left Behind
law is diagnosing too many public schools as failing, said Tuesday that
it would relax the law’s provisions for some states, allowing them to
distinguish schools with a few problems from those that need major
surgery."
“We need triage,” said Margaret Spellings, the secretary of education.
Read more at the New York Times: http://www.nytimes.com/2008/03/19/us/19child.html?_r=1&oref=slogin
|
|
|
NYC Using Standardized Tests to Rate Teachers |
|
|
|
|
Written by Robert A. Southworth Jr.
|
|
Wednesday, 23 January 2008 |
|
Jennifer Medina of The New York Times reported two days ago (Jan. 21, 2008) that 2,500 teachers are being evaluated by their student's test scores and some of the teachers don't even know it. Apparently the experimental program is being conducted by the city through the permission of principals and without the full scrutiny of the teachers involved and the unsuspecting public. The Times story brings out an important topic that holds much disagreement among educators—the role and power of teaching—to affect student learning how much of that effect shows up on standardized tests:
New York invited principals from hundreds of elementary and middle
schools with sufficient annual testing data to participate in the
program, which will produce an elaborate stream of data on 2,500
teachers. In 140 schools — a tenth of the roughly 1,400 in the
system — teachers are being measured on how many students in their
classes meet basic progress goals, how much student performance grows
each year, and how that improvement compares with the performance of
similar students with other teachers. In another 140 schools,
principals are being asked to make subjective evaluations of roughly
the same number of teachers so officials can see if the two systems
produce widely disparate results. New York City schools employ roughly
77,000 teachers. In all 280 schools, the principals agreed to
participate in the program. (NYTimes, Jan. 21, 2008).
From my point of view, the testing and assessment point of view, the connection between student learning as it shows up on standardized testing is valid and reliable in only a very general way—for example, perhaps standardized testing measures brain processing speed and that speed produces a constant bell curve of results amongst a wide populatin of students. However, student performance on standardized tests is a poor predictor of student intelligence, future student success, future decisions about students, and a very poor predictor of teachers' efficacy.
Luckily the city is studying subjective evaluations. Now the term subjective may worry parents, but compared to the false objectivity of standardized tests, I would rather trust what my daughter's well-trained teacher had to say about my daughter's learning than a standardized test. What I would suggest is that the city take those subjective evaluations and improve them by building the Capacity of teachers to conduct rigorous formative assessments in their classrooms. Then, I would judge teachers by their ability to help all students make effective annual progress in every classroom. I know this sounds like a non-standardized approach, but my daughters are non-Standard humans, and after all, we all want our kids to be educated, not to be compared to other kids on general characteristics like shoe-size and general intelligence processing speed.
|
|
|
EduCrate: Restoring Education Hope |
|
|
|
|
Written by Robert A. Southworth Jr.
|
|
Friday, 30 November 2007 |
|
School shortages in Tanzania, hurricane-stricken Texas, Louisiana and
Mississippi, tsunami-afflicted South East Asia, and earthquake-damaged
Pakistan all need fast and reliable restoration of essential services
such as food, housing, and education. Additionally, remote rural
communities here in the United States and in under-developed countries
abroad need cost-effective methods for delivering basic education
services.
EduCrates
are ready-to-use portable classrooms in shipping containers delivered
anywhere in the world within three months of calling! Interruptions of
children's education is unacceptable and we provide a timely solution
that restores education hope.
EduCrate classrooms are made from recycled shipping containers, and
they come complete with doors and windows, heating and air
conditioning, chairs and tables, black or whiteboards, classroom
supplies, and up to 25 backpacks that are filled with notebooks and
other essential student school supplies (see Contents).
EduCrates can be found at http://www.educrate.org/
The EduCrate
can be customized for use as a science lab or an art room, and an array
of upgrade options are available, including installed restrooms,
electric generators, and wireless computer networks. We can even send
support personnel (teachers and Professional Development staff) and
replacement curriculum materials, if needed (see Options).
|
|
|
No State has Taken Over a Failing School |
|
|
|
|
Written by Robert A. Southworth Jr.
|
|
Tuesday, 16 October 2007 |
The New York Times reports today that under No Child Left Behind (NCLB), the 2001 education law that is up for reconsideration this year, no school that has been labeled as "failing" has been taken over by the state, as the current law stipulates.
The Bush administration is pushing for narrow sanctions agaisnt schools who are labeled failing. The problem is compounded by the fact that poor schools seem to be targeted with no solutions except to close. For example, California has 6000 poor schools out of a total of 9000. Closing schools might be a good idea if there was some alternative. In New York City, the alternative is to close large failing high schools, and restructure them into groups of smaller high schools who share the original high school's facility.
No state has taken over a failing school because the alternatives to
closing a failing school are few and far between. If you choose to
label a school a failure as determined by testing you are ignoring lots
of other data. If you choose to restructure that failing school, you
then need to come up with four or more new schools, four or more new
teachers, and four or more new ways of doing business. I cannot stress
enough, however, that the government under NCLB is implementing a
failing Policy when it labels schools as "failures."
NCLB labels schools as failures by means of standardized testing. The underlying causes for a school's failure are not addressed. Any solution that ignores the wealth of unexamined data will perish in its own time. The crisis is not at the school level, rather, it is at the national level. We need to redisgn the system to be responsive to the Versatile Intelligence and Assessment, VIA (Southworth, 2006) of every child.
Educators all over the country share their frustrations with the NCLB law and its narrow use of standardized test data. In my mind, the continued use of limited data, in this case one test score from students on one standardized test, is ignoring the vast amount of data on student thinking, ability to make adequate yearly progress, and the variety of versatility of student intelligence on a wide range of academic tasks that are ignored when making these high stakes decisions.
|
|
| << Start < Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next > End >>
| | Results 1 - 7 of 41 |
|